Data Contract Basics. This attribute can be applied to classes, structures, and enumerations. The DataMemberAttribute attribute must then be applied to each member of the data contract type to indicate that it is a data member, that is, it should be serialized. For more information, see Serializable Types. DataContract Serialization is not working #146. Solution worked for me for most of the situations. But I couldn't solve 1 problem with this way: It doesn't serialize Attributes property. Model specifically intended for serialization, that represents the data you want to serialize, rather than the active object model you happen to. Description In order to serialize an object to XML using the DataContractJSerializer object the following is required: • The “ DataMember” attribute is used to mark the properties to serialize (private or public). • With this attribute is possible to set the output name of each property, if it is required, if the default value should be used and set the output order of each property; • The “ DataContract” attribute is used to classify the class as serializable; • For each properties of complex types the “ KnownType” attribute must be used, one per each complex type. Alternatively, a list of know types can be enumerated in the Serialize method. I've spent hours tonight trying to figure out how I can get my WCF DataContract to serialize properly and I'm going nuts. The DataContractSerializer, at this point, seems to me to be very restrictive with regards to the final xml format. For example, from what I can see, it only serializes XML elements. But what if I want the following. Lorex security camera app for pc. The closest I can get is the following (which is not what I want): Hello World Is there a way to get the first one, serializing attributes instead of elements? I can't find anything on the DataMemberAttribute attribute that gives an option to serializing as an element or an attribute, and I haven't been able to find any documentation anywhere discussing this possibility. My outlook is not syncing. I don't believe that you can. In that scenario, perhaps use XmlSerialer instead. But note that DataContractSerializer will happily use this (or equivalent) internally if you remove remove the data-contract attributes and add in the [Serializable] and [XmlAttribute] etc markers. Of course, this changes behaviour in a number of ways. Finally, note that DataContractSerializer also respects IXmlSerializable - but again this would need special handling. If you want simple metadata-based classes, then just live with what DataContractSerializer gives you. Or perhaps run it through an xslt? Yea, i went to bed on this last night and, as it happens so often, in my half-sleep state I thought of an alternative solution. I shouldn't care how the DataContractSerializer serializes the datacontract. Don't care at all. If I want to be that anal about preserving the original states of the XML that I'm writing a DataContract class for to send over the wire for a WCF service, then I'll simply write 2 services: 1 that returns my DataContract (which serializes as whatever), and a second that returns the raw XML as a string. Oooooooooooooooooh yea, that's what i'm talkin about!
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |